← Back to overview
Technologies & Integrations

Cooling networks: how they work, benefits and differences

July 8, 2024

With rising demand for sustainable cooling, cooling networks offer a solution similar to district heating. Learn how they work, their benefits, and key differences from heating systems.

Heat network - sustainability - energy efficiency - heating and cooling networks - source - user -

As climate change continues to capture global attention, the search for innovative ways to keep our living and working spaces comfortable is intensifying. While traditional heating demands dominate the winter months, there is a growing need for efficient and sustainable cooling solutions during summer heatwaves. Cooling networks, similar to district heating networks but focused on cooling, offer a promising solution. This article explores how cooling networks operate and compares them to the more familiar district heating systems to better understand their benefits and challenges.

What are cooling networks?

Cooling networks, also known as cooling distribution systems, provide cooling to various users similarly to how district heating networks supply heat. However, instead of using hot water or steam, cooling networks use chilled water or glycol solutions to distribute cooling effects to connected buildings, industries, or even entire urban districts.

How do cooling networks work?

The core of a cooling network is a central cooling plant, which typically consists of compressors, cooling towers, and heat exchangers. This facility chills water or another cooling medium to the desired temperature. The chilled medium is then pumped through insulated pipes to connected buildings or facilities, where heat exchangers transfer the cooling to internal climate control systems.

In buildings, this cooling can be used for air conditioning, cooling data centers, or for industrial processes like food storage or production. After use, the warmed medium returns to the central plant, where it is re-cooled, and the cycle repeats.

Differences between cooling networks and heating networks:

  1. Temperature Levels: The most obvious difference is the temperature of the transport medium. District heating systems supply heat for heating applications and typically operate at temperatures between 70°C and 120°C, whereas cooling networks provide cold at temperatures between 5°C and 15°C.
  2. Applications: District heating networks are mainly used for space heating and providing hot water. Cooling networks are used for cooling buildings, industries, and processes, but not for cooling water.
  3. Seasonality: District heating systems are often seasonal, with peak demand in winter. Cooling networks are usually used year-round, with peak cooling demand in summer.
  4. Efficiency: Cooling networks can often be more efficient than traditional air conditioning systems, as they utilize central cooling plants that generally operate more efficiently than individual cooling systems in buildings. Additionally, they alleviate the electricity grid by replacing individual air conditioning systems

Differences between cooling networks and heating networks

Advantages of cooling networks

  1. Energy efficiency: Central cooling plants can operate more efficiently than individual air conditioning systems, making cooling networks generally more energy-efficient.
  2. Environmental friendliness: Cooling networks can use sustainable energy sources like waste heat, solar energy, or geothermal energy for the cooling process, resulting in a lower carbon footprint compared to conventional cooling systems.
  3. Flexibility: Cooling networks can be designed to adapt to various cooling needs, from individual buildings to entire urban districts, providing a flexible solution for diverse applications.

Disadvantages of cooling networks

  1. High initial costs: Establishing a cooling network requires significant investment in infrastructure, leading to higher initial costs compared to traditional cooling systems.
  2. Distance limitations: Cooling networks are most cost-effective when used in densely populated areas with high cooling demand. In remote areas, building cooling networks can be economically unfeasible due to the high cost per connection.
  3. Maintenance and operational costs: Like heating networks, cooling networks require regular maintenance and have operational costs for managing and maintaining the infrastructure.

Conclusion

Cooling networks represent a promising approach to providing cooling in an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly way. While they have some challenges and limitations, they offer significant benefits in terms of energy efficiency, environmental friendliness, and flexibility. With ongoing technological innovations and increasing focus on sustainable energy solutions, cooling networks can play a crucial role in the transition to a low-carbon future.

You might also like...

Stay tuned

Subscribe to our newsletter and get quarterly updated on market news, our new customers, product updates and much more!

Stay Tuned - email - notifications - update - subscribe